Implant Stability and Histomorphometric Analysis Comparing Two Different Implant Macrogeometries Placed in Fresh Sockets: An Experimental Study in Sheep.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present animal study was to examine the impact of two implant designs that promote different insertion torque values on implant stability and evaluate, histomorphometrically, the bone healing for immediate implant placement in fresh sockets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve female sheep (35.0±5.0kg) and 48 conical Morse-taper dental implants divided into two groups (n = 24 per group): G1 group, where the implants present a design that can provide high insertion torque values; and G2 group, where the implants present a design that can provide low insertion torque values. Both had the same surface treatment, and dimensions (4.0 mm in diameter and 10 mm in length). The first two posterior teeth (both sides) were extracted carefully. Sequentially, there were osteotomies in the mesial socket of each molar tooth. The final implant position was 2 mm below the buccal bone crest level. On the right side, implants of the G1 were placed anteriorly, followed by implants of the G2; and, on the left side, it was the reverse. A digital torquemeter was used to measure the maximum final insertion torque value (f-IT). The initial implant stability quotient (ISQ) was measured immediately after the implant insertion (T0) and immediately after the euthanasia and removing the mandibles with the implants. The animals were euthanized (n=6 animals/ time) at 21 days (T1) and 35 days (T2). The t-test was used to compare statistical differences for each intragroup parameter analyzed. Pearson's correlation was used to analyze possible correlations: f-IT and BIC%, f-IT and ISQ, and ISQ and %BIC. RESULTS: Regarding the insertion torque, the G1 presented higher values than the G2, with a statistically significant difference (p<0.0001). The ISQ mean values were higher in the B-L direction than those obtained for M-D for both groups. %BIC measurements showed higher values in samples from G2 than G1 at both times and in both directions. New bone, medullary spaces, and collagen matrix had statistical differences between the groups at each evaluation time. CONCLUSION: Using implants with a modified macrogeometry plays a significant role in implant stability and the healing process of bone tissue around the implant. It is important for clinicians to carefully consider implant macrogeometry when planning dental implant surgery to achieve optimal implant stability and successful osseointegration, mainly in cases of immediate implant placement.

Effects of insertion torque values on the marginal bone loss of dental implants installed in sheep mandibles.

The aim of the present in vivo study was to analyze and compare the effects on the crestal bone healing of two different implant macrogeometries installed in fresh socket areas and in normal bone areas with different insertion torque values. Two implant macrogeometries were used in the present study, DuoCone implant (DC) and Maestro implant (MAE), forming four groups: group DCws, in which the implants were installed in healing bone (without a socket); group DCfs, in which the implants were installed in post-extraction areas (fresh sockets); group MAEws, in which the implants were installed in healing bone (without a socket); group MAEfs, in which the implants were installed in post-extraction areas (fresh sockets). After 30 and 90 days of implantations in the bilateral mandibles of 10 sheep, eighty implants were evaluated through digital X-ray images and histologic slices. The crestal bone position in relation to the implant platform shoulder was measured and compared. The measured insertion torque was 47.2 ± 4.69 Ncm for the DCws group, 43.4 ± 4.87 Ncm for the DCfs group, 29.3 ± 3.16 Ncm for the MAEws group, and 27.7 ± 4.41 Ncm for the MAEfs group. The radiographic mesio-distal and histological bucco-lingual analyses showed significantly greater vertical bone loss in the implants installed with high torque (DC groups) in comparison to the implants installed with a low torque (MAE groups) (p < 0.05), at both evaluation times. In general, low insertion torque values (Maestro implants) showed better results of MBL when compared to implants installed with higher torque values (Duo Cone implants). Moreover, our results showed that the implants installed in the sites without sockets showed a less MBL in comparison with the implants installed in sites of fresh sockets.

Histological and Histomorphometrical Evaluation of a New Implant Macrogeometry. A Sheep Study.

Decompression or healing chambers between the threads have been proposed to improve and accelerate the osseointegration process of dental implants. The aim of the present work was to test, in an in vivo sheep study, if healing chambers between the threads could produce a better osseointegration process. Thirty titanium implants (15 conventional design (control) and 15 implants with healing chambers (test)) were inserted in a random fashion in the tibia of 3 sheep. The animals were euthanized after 30 days of healing, and the retrieved specimens treated to obtain thin ground sections. Histological observations showed that the quantity of newly formed bone growing in an apical direction was lower in the control group (1095 µm) when compared to the Test group (1658 µm). This difference was statistically significant. Moreover, a layer of osteogenic matrix was present around the portion of implants immersed in the marrow spaces. This osteogenic tissue was thicker in the test group. In conclusion, the present study confirmed the very good results in implants with healing chambers that presented a higher percentage of new bone formation.